no more excuses

5. February 2012 by justdanika.

My mom, in her mid-30s, left her associate CPA job to, with a partner, to start her own public accounting firm.

“You know Danika, because I was good, I wasn’t discriminated against.”

Reading a recent NY times article, it refers to Sheryl Sandberg talking about women in tech:

“Specifically, how women, in her view, must take responsibility for their careers and not blame men for holding them back.”

If you are good, and you truly believe that, then you are the only one who can create the career you want. It isn’t going to just happen to you.

---

Women succeed in unique ways because of some

Natural Characteristics:

1. We can appear/be more approachable
2. We create stronger, more personal networks
3. We bring unique experiences to a conversation
4. When we do well, we are more memorable because we are women

---

Based on the powerful women I have interacted with, these are the other

Characteristics to Master:

• Be Confident
• Speak-up without Fear or Reason
• Share Relevant, Concise Stories
• Be Action-Oriented
• Be Willing to Bring-it in an Intense Conversation

Combining our natural characteristics with the strong skill sets needed to get ahead, there are no more excuses.

---

Ref:(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/business/sheryl-sandberg-of-facebook-staying-on-message.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all?src=tp)

Posted in tech, Design | No Comments »

ConnectEd in Australia

16. July 2010 by justdanika.

I went to Australia to be part of the International Conference on Design Education.

ConnectED 2010

It was a great reason to get my over seas with a purpose and a little bit of funding.

Highlight of the conference: Hearing the excitement, innovation and drive of the hundreds of educators who really care about teaching great Design.

They were doing great things like:
1. designing businesses within their schools to get students access to real world experiences (especially when internships are non-existent during a recession)
2. pushing the envelop of what collaboration means by teaming with new disciplines like performance art
3. constantly being surprised by the great work their students created and never settling for the notion of “what we have been teaching will work forever”

Design is a growing, changing field and these professors are in charge of teaching their students to  keep pushing the boundaries of the field. They prototype and fail, but they also prototype and are truly inspired by the creativity of how their students interpret a project.

This was a really intersting display of how one woman was looking at the different dimensions of her course so she could find what she needed to improve on and what she did well.

More design educators need to start pushing the envelope of what a design program needs and keep the cutting edge of design at the fingertips of their students to ensure their ability to get the best jobs when they leave.

Thanks to all the keynotes (especially Kees Doorst, Larry Leifer and Thomas Meier) for their risky but inspirational speeches, thanks to all the other educators who came to share and be inspired by other’s research and thanks to Pam Hinds for letting me write the paper and get this great opportunity.

Posted in Design | No Comments »

Improv as Life

12. May 2010 by justdanika.

I read Improv Wisdom last summer by Patricia Madson. It was a revolutionary way to approach life that was so relevant during my hectic summer in my sling that was full of anger and complications. It has been a source of inspiration for me on many occasions and my sister also has found it as a resource during her current pregnancy and life to keep her calm and centered.

I decided to just show up to a class one of my fellow Stanford Improvisers teaches on Monday because he had asked us to at some point and I felt like I wanted to. Not only did I get to play with a young group of excited improvisers, I also got to play with Patricia Madson herself. She was the guest teacher for the day doing a class on shared control.

It was a treat to play with her, see her excitement at creating and telling stories with the group, enjoy her passion as a teacher and her smile every time anything different came up.

I now have another source of inspiration when sharing improv with people. I absolutely love my teacher Dan Klein and have learned so much from his guidance on how to do improv. He has a natural ability to understand peoples actions and creates a safe space to be different. Patricia is wonderfully compassionate and caring as an improv teacher. She is different as she coaches improv as a way of life, not a theater experience. Both are creative and help craft the way we think (or don’t think) about what we should say next.

I find myself feeling lucky to have met these great improvisers and people on my journey here at Stanford. If any of you are ever so lucky…please take a class and embrace the improv as a way of life.

Posted in thesis, Design | 2 Comments »

Designing Teams…with Improv

15. April 2010 by justdanika.

I know that improv is powerful, and that it is an important life skill.

I believe improv can be a tool to help people experiment with tough interpersonal issues.

I am trying to apply improv games to specific situations to change a groups behavior and interactions.

I did my first prototype yesterday.

I got a really interesting reaction from a very “nice” team that has been neglecting strong emotions to drive their design process.

I had them do the “It’s Tuesday” exercise that allows them to have a huge reaction to a small thing with no relavence.

I watched as a very calm person yelled about a word…for no reason…and the reactions of his teammate who have never seen such a camotion from him.

He was moved by his own reaction to him raising his voice…

I can’t wait to inteview him about his reaction.

Posted in Design, Blogroll | 1 Comment »

decision paralysis

16. November 2009 by justdanika.

Design is a very open ended field…it is not like engineering.

One does not have a right or a wrong answer but an endless set of choices that need to be justified and supported. Everything one does is a decision and it will affect the future of that object. Its materials (acrylic or masonite), realism (working or looks-like), texure (inviting or passive). All these decisions weighing in on the end our our tongue, hopeing we are making the correct one.

Decision paralysis has hit me hard today:

Racquetball…do i go right and give it a backhand or left and go for the forehand…WAM it hits me in the stomach.

If I can’t decide that…how can I decide something I want to make for personal statement? Do I go left, right, up, down, through the tunnel, do I warp to another level or do I just try and avoid the koopas?

no wonder I was never any good at video games…

Posted in Design | No Comments »

whats a designer to do?

13. November 2009 by justdanika.

I can’t keep ignoring it…I have to think about what I want to do come June.

Maybe a better question is what am I qualified to do? What job title can I have? What value add does my background have to a potential employee? What values do I have as a designer have around what I want to do?

Is potential enough?

I want to be Genevieve Bell .

My criteria:

• I do not want to spend 8 hours a day behind a desk doing CAD, but I wouldn’t mind doing it once in a while.
• I want to work somewhere that I can have impact.
• I want to help the customers as well as the employees I work along side to have better days.
• I want to work for a company that recognizes my talents, actually see them as talents, and then utilize them.
• I want to work alongside people I can learn from.

What do I want to do?

I want to work with organizations to improve process, help companies see the customer at the end of the tunnel, and give employees the power and respect they deserve… A company can only be as great as it’s employees and I want those people to go home as satisfied and proud as the customers should when they take home their products.

It is holistic but it is important to design, innovation and creation.

Posted in Design | 1 Comment »

Blind Spots of Healthcare

3. November 2009 by justdanika.

Reading through a chapter of “Mistakes Were Made” a really interesting area came up that I recently had a conversation about. It was regarding the idea that doctors are balancing their patient’s needs against their own financial concern. This dichotomy is interesting because it seems contradictory that either is more important than the other and in the heat of the ongoing debate over health care in the US right now it is extremely relevant. Looking at the players, seeing their interests, understanding their blind spots we might be able to start understanding how to negotiate this.

 

First lets understand the different player’s interests. Doctor’s have a set of interests that need to be met, they need to pay back loans from 7 years in school, insurance for their risky job, deal with a lot high stress and other wonderful/agonizing things they go through daily to make other’s healthy. Patients want good, clean, safe, affordable healthcare efficiently. The government is supposed to keep the needs of their citizens at the forefront of their mind, trying to get doctors paid while also directly giving the patients lower costs. Lastly, the Insurance Companies are for profit organizations that provide people with financial help when they get sick but rarely engage in the actual dealings between the doctors and the patients. Not one of these players overlap on what they want from their experience, their number 1 interests are individual.

 

This is a large, and complex negotiation between lots of players about something very important, people’s well being. All of these people have a role that is important though, and their needs have to be met in order to keep the system working. It is a constant push-pull and ethics plays in a lot. Are doctor’s trying to take too much from the insurance companies, are insurance companies attempting to hide things from their clients, are patients not caring about where they get medical care since the insurance company will pay it anyway. All of these questions, though perhaps not thought of in this way, are probably an issue behind the scenes.

 

This is where the blind spots come in that were mentioned in “Mistakes Were Made”. I think all of these people think they are doing what is best for the patient and themselves. They can certainly justify their actions to themselves and state openly that their number one priority is the patient but it wouldn’t be such a large issue in government today if everyone was truly acting ethically.

 

“Blind spots enhance our pride and activate our prejudices.”

 

Whenever a doctor, or insurance worker or patient justifies that what they are doing is ethically ok, they are activating their prejudices of the other players. They are stating that the others are acting just as they expect them too. These prejudices create a sort of negative feedback loop which results in higher justified prices, more fights between patients and insurance companies and in the end the government picking up more and more health care bills and other patients having to subsidize those that can’t afford the healthcare they need.

 

These blind spots within this highly ethical debate allow our healthcare system to slowly spin out of control.

Posted in Design | 1 Comment »

collaborative efforts

23. October 2009 by justdanika.

Studying collaboration for my master’s project is like studying the world.

Life is collaborative.

I’ve decided to focus on 3 areas of collaboration that I personally find interesting and important.

“meetings”

Those boring events that you constantly roll your eyes at, doodle during, feel unproductive at the end and the momemt you walk out you forget exactly what happened

innovative idea generation

Brainstorming, though a group activity, is not actually collaborative. You don’t actually encourage the diverse range of information to build off each other.

collaborative ownership and responsibility

Community spaces are often dirty, go unused or are not actually productive in anyway. Community collapses around shared space because people don’t share well and contribute often.

I want to tackle collaboration in these areas because it is important to me for people to get together, get something done. I care about my communities and I think everyone should.

Group Creating

Group Creation

Posted in thesis, Design | 1 Comment »

Taking Design Home With You

9. September 2009 by justdanika.

Designing in another country is a great learning experience for foreign designers. First and foremost, all the references that the professors use and the students laugh about, as they are well known towns and products in the Netherlands, I have never seen before. They laugh about a town that “looks classic” but was built quite recently in order to give the same feeling of community as the old towns possess. They joke about a toy that looks like a blob with a face. The term classic is a loosely defined term that’s references differ from culture to culture as much as the language.

I wonder how one might teach design without a filter and what other references should be presented in a class to better prepare the students for global work. In the classes here in Delft, similar to mine at Stanford, they almost never reference design in Asia and if they do it is only in very recent terms. One might reference something of Japan or Korea with reverence but rarely China. China is a culture with a long history of craft. It has emerged more how their design is affected by their culture and history, but students rarely learn about it. Not to mention, how come you never hear about Australia in design?

Currently reading Design Inspired Innovation, it defines a classic design as a long-lived design that anchors and stabilizes the evolution of a firm’s product family. If the purpose of a classic is to give a base-line of what a good design is and classic is defined by culture, it may imply that doing cross-cultural design is the only way to really design for someone else. If you don’t get the culture, you can’t design for them. This I tend to agree with. It also means that students that go abroad to study design, though they may bring back some techniques and tools that can be helpful, they may not have studied their own culture enough to design for it.

With over 40 years of design history at Technical University Delft, it is easy to understand why they think their education system is effective. The program has Alumni that are lead designers at Philips, a CEO at BMW, and entrepreneurs starting companies based on their projects during school. Does this program output very specific types of designers and how will the international students be perceived when they return to their countries? Will they lack the knowledge of how to apply the design process to their own very difference culture? Can they mold the ideology they are taught into something they can utilize and share with others back at home?

Posted in Design | 2 Comments »

“Its marvelous what you can see when you open your eyes.”

17. May 2009 by justdanika.

All the different tools available on the internet have allowed people to share more information, collaborate and have better, stronger opinions. The availability of information from all different points of view and from a diverse group of people has been organized and made available to the masses. This sharing of information allows for people to be more informed to make better decisions when place in a group.

Applying these new tools to a democratic system has allowed for better decisions to be made. Decisions can be made without wondering what other people are thinking. You can truly collect and aggregate information and make an informed decision that takes into account your opinions and those of people who agree and disagree with you.

If cocoons are avoided you really will get a more democratic system working. I heard in a speach once that you should always discuss your opinions with someone who does not necessarily agree with you because it will improve your own opinion by 1) forcing you to justify why you think that way and 2) force you to accept that others are going to disagree with you. Democracy is based on this aspect and the internet has allowed people to become better, more well rounded citizens.

Cocoons are truly the biggest issue I can see. People secluding themselves in bubbles, not reading the news, not seeing how other people live, making conjectures about those that are not like them, stereotyping people without asking why and certainly living in spaces that allow them to not see the outside world. All of these types of actions are what will truly break the democracy that we need to keep creating to encourage information sharing and collaboration. I think the best way to make our democracy better is by encouraging people outside of these cocoons and to see the world as it is and then make a judgement based on the actual thing.

“Its marvelous what you can see when you open your eyes.”

-Unknown

Posted in Design | No Comments »